• Text Analysis Tools
• Free Text Analysis Software

Scholars have been increasingly concerned with portrayals of terrorism in mainstream and alternative media outlets following the September 11 and subsequent terrorist attacks in the United Kingdom and Spain. Communication researchers have examined public response and reaction to terrorist attacks, definitions of terrorism, policy questions, media portrayals of terrorism, and framing across different media and nations. This study undertakes a comparative framing analysis of media coverage of terrorism, as reported by prominent U.S. and U.K. newspapers, combining quantitative and qualitative methods. Findings revealed that the U.S. papers engaged in more episodic coverage and the U.K. papers in more thematic coverage of terrorism and terrorism-related events. The U.S. papers were consumed with presenting news associated with the military approach, whereas the U.K. papers were oriented toward diplomatic evaluations of terrorist events.

ManyEyes – interactive text visualizations (network diagram, word tree, phrase net, tag cloud, word cloud) Overview – Automatic topic tagging and visualization Monk Workbench – Corpus selection from library holdings, frequencies and corpora comparisons, supervised classification.

Baukus, R.A. , and S.M. Strohm. 2002. “Gender Differences in Perceptions of Media Reports of the gulf and Afghan Conflicts.” In Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11, ed. B. S. Greenberg , 275—87. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar

Blondheim, M. , and T. Liebes. 2003. “From Disaster Marathon to Media Event: Live Television's Performance on September 11, 2001, and September 11, 2002.” In Crisis Communications: Lessons from September 11, ed. A.M. Noll , 185—97. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar

Cappella, J. , and K.H. Jamieson. 1996. “News Frames, Political Cynicism, and Media Cynicism.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 546:71—85. Google Scholar SAGE Journals ISI

Cappella, J. , and K.H. Jamieson. 1997. Spiral of Cynicism:The Press and the Public Good. NewYork: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

Cohen, E.L. , S.J. Ball-Rokeach , J.-Y. Jung , and Y.-C. Kim. 2003. “Civic Actions after September 11: A Communication Infrastructure Perspective.” In Crisis Communications: Lessons from September 11, ed. A.M. Noll , 31—43. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar

Cohen-Almagor, R. 2005. “Media coverage of acts of terrorism: Troubling Episodes and Suggested Guidelines.” Canadian Journal of Communication 30:383—409. Google Scholar Crossref

Cooke, T. 2003. “Paramilitaries and the Press in Northern Ireland.” In Framing Terrorism: The News Media, the Government, and the Public, ed. P. Norris , M. Kern , and M. Just , 75—92. New York: Routledge . Google Scholar

Corman, S. , and K. Dooley. 2006. Crawdad Text Analysis System 1.2. Chandler, AZ: Crawdad Technologies, LLC . Google Scholar

Corman, S. , T. Kuhn , R. McPhee , and K. Dooley. 2002. “Studying Complex Discursive Systems: Centering Resonance Analysis of Communication.” Human Communication Research 28(2):157—206. Google Scholar ISI

Debatin, B. 2002. “`Plane Wreck with Spectators': Terrorism and Media Attention.” In Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11, ed. B.S. Greenberg , 163—74. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar

Dooley, K.J. , and S.R. Corman. 2002. “The Dynamics of Electronic Media Coverage.” In Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11, ed. B.S. Greenberg , 121—35. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar

Dooley, K.J. , and S.R. Corman. 2004. “Dynamic Analysis of News Streams: Institutional Versus Environmental Effects.” Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences 8(3):403—28. Google Scholar Medline

Entman, R.M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm .” Journal of Communication 43:51—68. Google Scholar Crossref ISI

Fairclough, N. 1995. Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold. Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. 2000. “Critical Analysis of Media Discourse.” In Media Studies: A Reader, 2nd Edition, ed. P. Marris and S. Thornham. New York: NYU Press . Google Scholar

Fairhurst, G.T. , and R.A. Sarr. 1996. The Art of Framing: Managing the Language of Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Google Scholar

Gitlin,T. 1980. The Whole World is Watching. Berkeley : University of California Press. Google Scholar

Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience . New York: Harper & Row. Google Scholar

Greenberg, B.S. , ed. 2002. Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar

Greenberg, B.S. , L. Hofschire , and K. Lachlan. 2002. “Diffusion, Media Use and Interpersonal Communication Behaviors.” In Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11, ed. B.S. Greenberg , 3—16. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar

Haes, J.W.H. 2003. “September 11 in Germany and the United States: Reporting, Reception, and Interpretation.” In Crisis Communications: Lessons from September 11, ed. A.M. Noll , 125—32. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar

Hart, W.B.I. , and F. Hassencahl. 2002. “Dehumanizing the Enemy in Editorial Cartoons.” In Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11, ed. B.S. Greenberg , 137—51. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar

Hoffner, C. , Y. Fujioka , A. Ibrahim , and J. Ye. 2002. “Emotion and Coping with Terror.” In Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11, ed. B.S. Greenberg , 229—44. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar

Iyengar, S. 1991. Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Illinois: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar Crossref

Jackson, G. 1990. “Terrorism and the News Media.” Terrorism & Political Violence 2(4):521—28. Google Scholar Crossref

Jasperson, A.E. , and M.O. El-Kikhia. 2003. “CNN and al Jazeera's Media Coverage of America's War in Afghanistan.” In Framing Terrorism: The News Media, the Government, and the Public, ed. P. Norris , M. Kern , and M. Just , 113—32. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar

Katz, J.E. , and R.E. Rice. 2003. “The Telephone as Medium of Faith, Hope, Terror, and Redemption: America, September 11.” In Crisis Communications: Lessons from September 11, ed. A.M. Noll , 83—97. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar

Kim, Y.-C. , S.J. Ball-Rokeach , E.L. Cohen , and J.-Y. Jung. 2002. “Communication Infrastructure and Civic Actions in Crisis.” In Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11, ed. B.S. Greenberg , 289—303. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar

Liebes, T. , and A. First. 2003. “Framing the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict.” In Framing Terrorism: The News Media, the Government, and the Public, ed. P. Norris , M. Kern , and M. Just , 59—74. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar

McCombs, M. and Ghanem, S. 2001. “The Convergence of Agenda Setting and Framing .” In Framing Public Life , ed. S. Reese, A. Grant, and O. Gandy. Mahwah, NJ : LEA. Google Scholar

Mogensen, K. , L. Lindsay , X. Li , J. Perkins , and M. Beardsley. 2002. “How TV News Covered the Crisis: The Content of CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC and Fox.” In Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11, ed. B.S. Greenberg , 101—19. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar

Nacos, B.L. 2002. Mass-mediated Terrorism: The Central Role of the Media in Terrorism and Counterterrorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar

Nacos, B.L. , and O.Torres-Reyna. 2003. “Framing Muslim-Americans Before and After 9/11.” In Framing Terrorism: The News Media, the Government, and the Public, ed. P. Norris , M. Kern , and M. Just , 93—112. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar

Noelle-Neumann, E. 2002. “Public Opinion Responses in Germany.” In Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11 , ed. B.S. Greenberg , 205—16. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar

Noll, A.M. , ed. 2003. Crisis Communications: Lessonsfrom September 11. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar

Norris, P. , M. Kern , and M. Just. 2003. “FramingTerrorism.” In Framing Terrorism:The News Media, the Government, and the Public , ed. P. Norris , M. Kern , and M. Just , 3—26. NewYork: Routledge. Google Scholar

Patterson, T. 1993. Out of Order. New York: Knopf. Google Scholar

Patterson, T. 1996. “Bad News, Bad Governance.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 546:97—108. Google Scholar SAGE Journals ISI

Perse, E. , N. Signorielli , J. Courtright , W. Samter , S. Caplan , and J. Lambe. 2002. “Public Perceptions of Media Functions at the Beginning of the War on Terrorism.” In Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11, ed. B.S. Greenberg , 39—52. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar

Picard, R.G. 1993. Media Portrayals of Terrorism: Functions and Meaning of News Coverage. Ames: Iowa State University Press. Google Scholar

Reese, S. 2001. “Framing Public Life.” In Framing Public Life , ed. S. Reese, A. Grant, and O. Gandy. Mahwah, NJ: LEA. Google Scholar

Rogers, E.M. 2003. “Diffusion of News of the September 11 Terrorist Attacks.” In Crisis Communications: Lessons from September 11, ed. A.M. Noll , 17—30. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar

Ruggiero, T. , and J. Glascock , J. 2002. “Tracking Media Use and Gratifications.” In Communication andTerrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11, ed. B.S. Greenberg , 65—74. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar

Rusciano, F.L. 2003. Framing World Opinion in the Elite Press. In Framing Terrorism:The News Media, the Government, and the Public , ed. P. Norris , M. Kern , and M. Just , 159—82. NewYork: Routledge. Google Scholar

Schaefer, T. 2003. “Framing the U.S. Embassy Bombings and September 11 Attacks in African and U.S. Newspapers.” In Framing Terrorism:The News Media, the Government, and the Public, ed. P. Norris , M. Kern , and M. Just , 93—112. NewYork : Routledge. Google Scholar

Semetko, H. , J.G. Blumler , M. Gurevitch , and D.H. Weaver. 1991. The Formation of Campaign Agendas. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar

Seeger, M.W. , S. Vennette , R.R. Ulmer , and T.L. Sellnow. 2002. “Media Use, Information Seeking, and Reported Needs in Post Crisis Contexts.” In Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11, ed. B.S. Greenberg , 53—63. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar

Stempel, G.H., III , and T. Hargrove. 2002. “Media Sources of Information and Attitudes about Terrorism.” In Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11, ed. B.S. Greenberg , 17—26. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar

Stohl, M. 1988. Demystifying Terrorism: The Myths and Realities of Contemporary Political Terrorism. In The Politics of Terrorism , ed. M. Stohl , 1—28. NewYork: Marcel Dekker. Google Scholar

Tankard, J. , L. Henderson , J. Silberman , K. Bliss , and S. Ghanem. 1991. “Media Frames: Approaches to Conceptualization and Measurement.”Paper presented to the Communication Theory and Methodology Division, Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Boston, 1991. Google Scholar

van Dijk, T.A. 1997. “Discourse as Interaction in Society.” In Discourse as Social Interaction, ed. T.A. van Dijk. London: Sage. Google Scholar

Venkatraman, S. 2004. Media in a Terrorized World: Reflection in the Wake of 9/11. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press. Google Scholar

Weimann, G. 1985. Terrorists or Freedom Fighters? Labeling Terrorism in the Israeli Press. Political Communication & Persuasion 2:433—45. Google Scholar Crossref

Wood, L.A. & Kroger, R.O. 2000. Doing Discourse Analysis: Methods for Studying Action in Talk and Text. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Google Scholar

During a clean out of my email application this morning — and we won’t discuss how badly I have been managing incoming mail of late, I came across a [Humanist DG][] post, in response to an inquiry about text analysis software, to [Diction][]: > DICTION is a computer-aided text analysis program. Many text mining software packages are marketed for security applications, especially monitoring and analysis of online plain text sources such as Internet news, blogs, etc. For national security purposes. Tering resonance analysis (CRA) method, as implemented in the Crawdad text analysis software product, available from Crawdad Technologies, LLC.1 Descriptions of CRA are available in the open literature [6, 7, 8]. In a nutshell, CRA is a method of computer-assisted, network-based text analysis that assumes texts achieve coherence through. G-PRIME: A Free, Windows Based Data Acquisition and Event Analysis Software Package for Physiology in Classrooms and Research Labs. Key words: physiology software, data analysis, data acquisition, crawdad, student laboratory software As the modern life sciences mature as technical fields. And text files with two. Read chapter Using Computerized Text Analysis to Assess Threatening Communications and Behavior--Cindy K. Chung and James W. Pennebaker: Today's world of.

http likes 47
Commercial online free

On-line Text Mining / Text Analytics Tools

• Ranks.nl, keyword analysis and webmaster tools.
• Text Sentiment Visualizer (online), Using deep neural networks and D3.js.
• Vivisimo/Clusty web search and text clustering engine.
• Wordle, a tool for generating 'word clouds' from text that you provide.

Text Analysis Tools

Commercial Text Mining / Text Analytics Software

• ActivePoint, offering natural language processing and smart online catalogues, based contextual search and ActivePoint's TX5(TM) Discovery Engine.
• Aiaioo Labs, offering APIs for intention analysis, sentiment analysis and event analysis. Aiaioo online demo.
• AKIN Desktop HyperSearch commoditizes enterprise quality fuzzy pattern recognition logic with built-in AI.
• Alceste, a software for the automatic analysis of textual data (open questions, literature, articles, etc.)
• AlchemyAPI, the world's leading text analysis service, processing billions of documents every month.
• Angoss Text Analytics, part of KnowledgeStudio, allows users to merge the output of unstructured, text-based analytics with structured data to perform data mining and predictive analytics.
• Ascribe, offering a unique hybrid technology approach, blending natural language processing, machine learning and semi-automated coding tools, since 1999.
• Attensity, offers a complete suite of Text Analytic applications, including the ability to extract 'who', 'what', 'where', 'when' and 'why' facts and then drill down to understand people, places and events and how they are related.
• Basis Technology, provides natural language processing technology for the analysis of unstructured multilingual text.
• Buzzlogix, helps to enable developers and businesses to build smarter data applications through a SaaS based Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning APIs.
• Clarabridge, text mining software providing end-to-end solution for customer experience professionals wishing to transform customer feedback for marketing, service and product improvements.
• ClearForest, tools for analysis and visualization of your document collection.
• Clustify, groups related documents into clusters, providing an overview of the document set and aiding with categorization.
• Compare Suite, compares texts by keywords, highlights common and unique keywords.
• Connexor Machine, discovers the grammatical and semantic information of natural language.
• Copernic Summarizer, can read and summarize document and Web page text contents in many languages from various applications
• Crossminder, natural language processing and text analytics (including cross-lingual text mining).
• Dataladder ProductMatch, uses best in class Semantic Technology to recognize and transform unstructured and unpredictable data.
• DataRPM, offering Natural Language Question Answering and Automatic Data Modeling.
• Dhiti, providing an API for text-mining; can work on a document collection and mine out topics and concepts in realtime.
• DiscoverText, a cloud-based text analytics solution with many powerful features, including an Active Learning machine classification engine. Provides valuable insights about employees, customers, products, news, and citizens.
• dtSearch, for indexing, searching, and retrieving free-form text files.
• Eaagle text mining software, enables you to rapidly analyze large volumes of unstructured text, create reports and easily communicate your findings.
• Enkata, providing a range of enterprise-level solutions for text analysis.
• Entrieva, patented technology indexes, categorizes and organizes unstructured text from virtually any source.
• Expert System, using proprietary COGITO platform for the semantic comprehension of the language to do knowledge management of unstructured information.
• Files Search Assistant, quick and efficient search within text documents.
• IBM InfoSphere Warehouse Enterprise Edition, including advanced analytics, OLAP, data mining and text analytics.
• IBM SPSS Predictive Analytics suite for data and text mining.
• IKANOW Infinit.e, all-in-one big data analytics solution for harvesting and analyzing both structured and unstructured data, including social media data from Twitter, Facebook, and Google+.
• Intellexer, natural language searching technologies for developing knowledge management tools, document comparison software and document summarization software, custom built search engines and other intelligent software.
• ISYS Search Software, an enterprise search software supplier specializing in embedded search, text extraction, federated access solutions and text analytics.
• IxReveal, offering uReveal 'plug-in' advanced analytic platform and uReka! desktop 'search and analyze' consumer product, based on patented text analytics methods.
• KBSPortal, offers natural language processing as SaaS web service.
• Keatext, a cloud-based text analytics and reporting platform for quick analysis and actionable insights from unstructured customer feedback.
• KNIME, an open source analytics platform which offers extensions for text analysis currently including Stanford NLP, Palladin, and Linguamatics.
• Kwalitan 5 for Windows, uses codes for text fragments to facilitate textual search, display overviews, build hierarchical trees and more.
• Langsoft question-answering and content recognition/text attribution software, evaluation copy available.
• Lexalytics, provides enterprise and hosted text analytics software to transform unstructured text into structured data.
• Leximancer, makes automatic concept maps of text data collections
• Lextek Onix Toolkit, for adding high performance full-text indexing search and retrieval to applications.
• Lextek Profiling Engine, for automatically classifying, routing, and filtering electronic text according to user defined profiles.
• Linguamatics, offering Natural language processing (NLP), search engine approach, intuitive reporting, and domain knowledge plug-in.
• Loop AI Labs, maker of Loop Cognitive Computing Platform, which combines HPC custom-built hardware and proprietary software to automates processing and understanding unstructured text data of enterprises and organizations.
• Luminoso, ontology-free text analytics solution, led by some of the top research scientists at the MIT Media Lab.
• MeaningCloud, a simple and affordable way to turn unstructured content into actionable data, with advanced text analytics functionality through standard web services and plug-ins.
• Megaputer Text Analyst, offers semantic analysis of free-form texts, summarization, clustering, navigation, and natural language retrieval with search dynamic refocusing.
• Monarch, data access and analysis tool that lets you transform any report into a live database.
• MonkeyLearn, a Text Mining tool for creating Machine Learning applications; it provides classification, extraction, clustering and regression modules via web and API, with pay as you go pricing.
• NetOwl (from SRA International), multilingual text and entity analytics: extracts entities, links, and events, performs name matching and identity resolution, assigns latitude/longitude to geographical references, translates names in foreign languages, and performs sentiment analysis.
• NewsFeed Researcher, presents live multi-document summarization tool, with automatically-generated RSS news feeds.
• Nstein, Enterprise Search and Information Access Technologies; On your public website, Nstein will guide your customers to the most relevant information more quickly than other solutions.
• ODINText, complete text analytics software platform for consumer insights and customer service professionals.
• Ontotext provides semantic technology blending text mining, inference and a graph database to deliver optimized knowledge management, search and semantic analysis solutions.
• Picturesafe semantic system categorizes and analyzes all this information completely automatically, recognizes content and similarities between different media, and dramatically speeding up journalistic and publishing research.
• Plagiarism Software, free online check for plagiarism.
• PolyVista, advanced listening, filtering, and analysis software and services to make sense of everything said about your company.
• Power Text Solutions, extensive capabilities for 'free text' analysis, offering commercial products and custom applications.
• Readability Studio, offers tools for determining text readability levels.
• Recommind MindServer, uses PLSA (Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis) for accurate retrieval and categorization of texts.
• RightFind(tm) XML for Mining (from Copyright Clearance Center), enables life science researchers to build a corpus of full-text articles in XML format for use in their preferred text mining software.
• SAS Text Miner, provides a rich suite of text processing and analysis tools.
• Semantex from Janya Inc., enterprise-class information extraction system, detecting entities, attributes, relationships and events.
• Skyttle API, a SaaS platform for sentiment analysis and keyword extraction. Supports English, French, German and Russian. See online demo at www.skyttle.com/demoin.
• SWAPit, Fraunhofer-FIT text and data analysis tool (updated version of DocMINER), offers visual text mining and retrieval capabilities, including search, term statistics, and summary; visualises semantic relationships among text documents.
• TEMIS Luxid®, an Information Discovery solution serving the Information Intelligence needs of business corporations.
• TeSSI®, software components that perform semantic indexing, semantic searching, coding and information extraction on biomedical literature.
• Text Analysis Info, offering software and links for Text Analysis and more
• Textalyser, online text analysis tool, providing detailed text statistics
• TextPipe Pro, text conversion, extraction and manipulation workbench.
• TextQuest, text analysis software
• Treparel KMX Text Analytics delivers fast and powerful search, clear visual insights and advanced analytics for information professionals, information consumers and in OEM partnerships.
• Readware Information Processor for Intranets and the Internet, classifies documents by content; provides literal and conceptual search; includes a ConceptBase with English, French or German lexicons.
• Quenza, automatically extracts entities and cross references from free text documents and builds a database for subsequent analysis.
• VantagePoint provides a variety of interactive graphical views and analysis tools with powerful capabilities to discover knowledge from text databases.
• VisualText, a comprehensive text analytics development environment, with NLP++ language, hierarchical/graphical knowledge base, automated rule generation, single parse tree, in a multi-pass, multi-paradigm framework.
• VP Student Edition powerful text-mining and visualization tool for discovering knowledge in search results from science literature and other field-structured text databases.
• Xanalys Indexer, an information extraction and data mining library aimed at extracting entities, and particularly the relationships between them, from plain text.
• Wordstat, analysis module for textual information such as responses to open-ended questions, interviews, etc.

Windows 7 64-bit free download. Halo foam armor templates. Many packages above offer free or limited trial versions.

Free and Open-Source Text Mining / Text Analytics Software

Free Text Analysis Software

• Aika, an open-source library for mining frequent patterns within text, using ideas from neural nets and grammar induction.
• Coding Analysis Toolkit (CAT), free, open source, web-based text analysis tool.
• Data Science Toolkit, includes geo, text, NLP, and sentiment analysis tools.
• Datumbox, a free API and many functions for Sentiment Analysis, Language Detection, Topic Classification and easily building intelligent apps.
• FreeLing, an open source language analysis tool suite, GNU GPL.
• GATE, a leading open-source toolkit for Text Mining, with a free open source framework (or SDK) and graphical development environment.
• Grammarcheck.net, a free online grammar check, for English.
• IKANOW Infinit.e open source Community Edition, a scalable framework for collecting, storing, processing, retrieving, analyzing, and visualizing unstructured documents and structured records.
• INTEXT, MS-DOS version of TextQuest, in public domain since Jan 2, 2003.
• LingPipe is a suite of Java libraries for the linguistic analysis of human language.
• Microsoft Distributed Machine Learning Toolkit DMTK, open source, includes framework that supports data parallelization, LightLDA, topic model algorithm, and Distributed (Multisense) Word Embedding algorithm.
• Open Calais, an open-source toolkit for including semantic functionality within your blog, content management system, website or application.
• RapidMiner Text Mining.
• ReVerb: Open Information Extraction Software, extracts binary relationships like high-in (winter squash, vitamin c) without requiring any relation-specific training data.
• S-EM (Spy-EM), a text classification system that learns from positive and unlabeled examples.
• tagtog, the text annotation tool to train AI.
• The Semantic Indexing Project, offering open source tools, including Semantic Engine - a standalone indexer/search application.
• TXM - Unicode, XML, TEI text/corpus analysis platform, including graphical client, based on the CQP search engine and R environment.

Related